Optimised management of riverine landscapes based on a multi criteria Decision Support System: merging societal requirements and ecologic development in a changing world.
- Boden und Landökosysteme
- Wasser - Atmosphäre - Umwelt
- Lebensraum und Landschaft
- Beitrag zu "Genderspezifische Forschung (Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung)
Abstract
This project serves to promote biogas production from energy crops. The energy crops: sunflowers, meadow grass, wheat, triticale, rye and maize were investigated. All energy crops were harvested in the course of the vegetation period at four to six different times. At each harvest, yield measurements were carried out, as well as biomass sampled for silaging and the subsequent ingredient analyses. Following, laboratory investigations for the determination of the specific methane yield were carried out with the help of Eudiometer-instrumentation. The methane hectare yield and the optimal harvest times were determined for all of the investigated energy crops. Of all the energy crop species investigated in this project, maize showed the highest bio-mass yields and methane yields per hectare (up to 31 t DM ha-1 and up to 12,657 Nm3 CH4 ha-1). Sunflowers achieved approximately 30% of the methane hectare yield obtained by maize, cereals or intensively farmed meadow grass on average 26.5%. Variations of 6 to 38% in methane hectare yield appeared within the examined energy crop species depending on the variety, the place of cultivation, the management intensity or the harvest time. For an economic biogas production, the right choice of variety and the optimal harvest time has a great relevance. The effect of pretreatment measures (acidifying, heat treatment, microwave irradiation and addition of clay minerals) on the specific methane yield of energy crops was examined. heat, microwaves and acid pretreatment aimed to induce a predigestion of the crude fiber fraction. This effect was only observed with meadow grass and sunflowers, not however for cereals. The addition of clay minerals increased the specific methane yield of all energy crops. The optimal hydraulic retention times, determined in this project, lay between 20 days (cereal silage from whole crop) and 42 days (sunflower silage). Besides the energy crop type, the hydraulic retention time also appear to be influenced by the harvest year and the assigned pretreatment measure. These results must be verified in further investigations with dynamic systems. With the data from the project, the Methane Energy Value Model for maize could be continued so far that it can now be used in practice. The data base for the estimation of the methane energy value of cereals, sunflowers and meadow grass requires further investigations. The influence of the protein:energy ratio of mixtures of energy crops on the specific methane yield and on the biogas quality was examined with mixtures of protein-rich clover grass silage and energy-rich maize silage. A higher portion of maize silage in the mixture resulted in a higher specific methane yield. The higher the protein content and/or the portion of clover grass silage in the fermenting mixture, the lower the methane content in the produced biogas and the higher the hydrogen sulfide and ammonia content. Guidelines for (a) optimized biogas production from energy crops, (b) efficient fertilization with fermentation residues of fermented energy crops as well as (c) different uses of biogas are given. In order to achieve long-term success, the cultivation of energy crops must be organized using sustainable crop rotation principles. Locally adapted biological and conventional crop rotations were developed in this project with the prospects of energy crop cultivations as main and intermediate crops. The results of this project show that the potentials of biogas from energy crops are larger than have been assumed so far. The present, new calculations of integrated biogas production systems show an annual total potential of 4.8 million t ROE or 4.8 billion m3 methane. That means if the potentials of biogas production would be used, in Austria more than 16 million t CO2 emissions could be saved per year. This equals exactly the current requirements of reduction in Austria to reach the Kyoto target.
- ecosystem management
- floodplain
- decision support system
- Danube
Publications
Optimised management strategies for the Biosphere reserve Lobau, Austria - based on a multi criteria decision support system: using ecohydrological model approaches
Autoren: Hein, T; Blaschke, A P; Haidvogl, G; Hohensinner, S; Kucera-Hirzinger, V; Muhar, S; Preiner, S; Reiter, K; Schuh, B; Weigelhofer, G; Zsuffa, I Jahr: 2006
Journal articles
Impact of hydrological connectivity on primary production patterns of large river floodplains
Autoren: Preiner S., Baart I., Blaschke A.P., Bondar E., Habereder C., Zsuffa I. & Hein T. Jahr: 2006
Conference & Workshop proceedings, paper, abstract
Macrophytes and aquatic neophytes in the floodplain Lobau during the last 160 years: temporal distribution
Autoren: Baart I., Haidvogl G., Hohensinner S., Janauer G., Preiner S., Hein T. Jahr: 2006
Conference & Workshop proceedings, paper, abstract
Optima Lobau: An interdisciplinary scientific approach evaluating future scenarios in an urban floodplain
Autoren: Weigelhofer G., Blaschke A., Haidvogl G., Hohensinner S., Reckendorfer W., Reiter K., Schuh B., Hein T. Jahr: 2006
Conference & Workshop proceedings, paper, abstract
Urban floodplains - Optimised management strategies in the face of conflicting ecological and socio-economic demands
Autoren: Hein T.; Blaschke, A.P.; Haidvogl, G., Hohensinner, S.; Muhar, S.; Preiner, S.; Reiter, K.; Schuh, B.; Weigelhofer, G., Zsuffa, I. Jahr: 2006
Conference & Workshop proceedings, paper, abstract
Optima Lobau - Lösungsansätze für das Management urbaner Auen
Autoren: Weigelhofer G; Hohensinner S; T Hein Jahr: 2007
Journal articles
What are potential options for a sustainable management perspective for an international protected floodplain area, the Lobau
Autoren: Hein T., Baart I., Blaschke A.P., Haidvogl G., Hohensinner S., Preiner S., Reiter K., Schuh B., Weigelhofer G. Jahr: 2007
Conference & Workshop proceedings, paper, abstract
The geology and geomorphology of floodplains
Autoren: Demek, J., Drescher, A., Hohensinner, S., Schwaighofer, B. Jahr: 2008
Chapter in collected volumes
Die Stadt und der Strom - Historische Veränderungen der Wiener Donau-Auen seit dem 18. Jahrhundert
Autoren: Hohensinner, S., Eberstaller-Fleischanderl, D., Haidvogl, G., Herrnegger, M., Weiß, M. Jahr: 2008
Journal articles
Flussmorphologische Charakteristik der Donau - historische Perspektive
Autoren: Hohensinner, S; Jungwirth, M Jahr: 2009
Journal articles
Type-specific reference conditions of fluvial landscapes: A search in the past by 3D-reconstruction
Autoren: Hohensinner, S; Herrnegger, M; Blaschke, AP; Habereder, C; Haidvogl, G; Hein, T; Jungwirth, M; Weiss, M Jahr: 2008
Journal articles
Rekonstruktion historischer Flusslandschaften als Grundlage im Gewässermanagement - Potential und Limits
Autoren: Haidvogl, G; Hohensinner, S; Preis, S Jahr: 2011
Journal articles
Die unbekannte dritte Dimension: Geländehöhen, Gewässertiefen und Dynamik österreichischer Donaulandschaften vor der Regulierung
Autoren: Hohensinner, S; Jungwirth, M Jahr: 2016
Journal articles
The Danube Floodplain National Park: A Fluvial Landscape with Expiration Date?
Autoren: Hohensinner, S; Pöppl, R Jahr: 2022
Chapter in collected volumes
Project staff
Thomas Hein
Univ.Prof. Dr. Thomas Hein
thomas.hein@boku.ac.at
Tel: +43 1 47654-81201, 81229
Project Leader
01.11.2005 - 31.10.2008
Susanne Muhar
Ao.Univ.Prof.i.R. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.nat.techn. Susanne Muhar
susanne.muhar@boku.ac.at
Tel: +43 1 47654-81210
Project Staff
01.11.2005 - 31.10.2008
Gertrud Haidvogl
Priv.-Doz. Mag. Dr.phil. Gertrud Haidvogl
gertrud.haidvogl@boku.ac.at
Tel: +43 1 47654-81204
Sub Projectleader
01.11.2005 - 31.10.2008
Severin Hohensinner
Dipl.-Ing. Dr.nat.techn. Severin Hohensinner
severin.hohensinner@boku.ac.at
Tel: +43 1 47654-81203
Project Staff
01.11.2005 - 31.10.2008
BOKU partners
External partners
Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning
none
partner
University of Vienna, Insitute of Ecology and Conservation Biology
none
partner
Technical University Vienna, Institute of Hydraulics and Water Management
none
partner